Where it was won: It was an overall solid round of golf from Watson to get the job done, but there are couple of key moments that stand out most. At the 17th after carrying his approach shot a yard too far, he had a ticklish downhill pitch from the rough. He got the ball about as close as he could -- nine feet, five inches -- and then calmly and confidently rolled in the par putt. His play on the 18th showcased all the facets of his game. The power, as his 334 yard tee shot found the short grass; the creativity to escape a tricky lie in the bunker, with the ball nestled tight to the lip causing him to play his shot left of the flag in hopes that the slope would bring it clsoe; and the new-found confidence to drain the 10-foot championship-clinching putt.
Where it was lost: There are three distinct moments where Phil Mickelson lost this tournament. First -- and it's not as though you can really fault him for this -- was at the 13th where he was fractionally off with either his speed or his line and his eagle putt horseshoed out of the cup. Second was at the 14th where he mis-clubbed on his approach from the fairway and was unable to get up-and-down from the bunker. Finally there is his choice to layup on 18, rather than attack the green. Alan Shipnuck of Sports Illustrated thinks it was the right idea.
Awful lie. Better chance to make 3 by laying-up RT @GilroyTX Phil's never boring but never smart. Should have waited and gone for the green.
And Mickelson certainly made sense in his explanation, saying "I had 227 to carry. If I hit a hybrid, the ball would have come out dead and there was hurt, so I couldn't have made it over the water. But the way my 3 wood is, the ball would have come out hot and it would have went screaming over. So I didn't really have a shot to get it on the green. I felt like I had a better chance to make a three from the fairway trying to use that bank and bringing the ball back or flying it in."
It's not that I think Phil's decision was wrong -- and it sure is easy to say he lost the tournament there with the clarity provided by hindsight -- but it just seems strange given his approach on the following shot (at 2:10 mark) and the margin for error he had there while leading.
I will say this. Tournaments often come down to a hypothetical "He can tie if -- and only if -- he holes out for eagle" but very few have provided the kind of theatrics that this did.
Jhonattan Vegas also found himself falling out of contention when he found the water trying to reach the green in two at the 18th. There are a couple of things worthy of mention here. 1. Had he made eagle, he would have ended up in playoff with Watson so you can't fault him there. 2. It seems indicative of his approach that, although par was salvagable, the tournament was not and he missed his putt. I don't think it will be very long before he wins again. Maybe even this year.
Shots of the week
Stat of the Week
Watson's ball striking was on point all week, as he led the field in GIR (81.9 per cent), driving distance (316.6 yards) and proximity to the hole at just under 26-feet on average.
How I did
Brandt Snedeker, -9 T9
Charles Howell III, -7 T14
Camilo Villegas, -1 T44
Robert Allenby, CUT
Ryuji Imada, CUT
Early look at next week
-I like: Ryan Moore, Kevin Na, J.B. Holmes, Pat Perez
